Linda's posts may be longer but they are by far not dumber. There are numerous pointless messages on this message board that didn't require any study and have many grammatical errors. Like the one on this thread. Someone needs to learn when to use silent and silently before they wax poetic.
"The Morality of God" that Linda wrote was well researched and not a waste of anyone's time. I knew that post would set theists spinning like a lathe. It does renounce the morality of the bible. I am an atheist and I have no problem with what was written.
On the other hand I have a big problem with what Michael Brown said, "The difference in what I have and what you offer today is HOPE. In your humanist religion there is really no hope, no true happiness, for at the end of your days, POOF, you cease to exist. It is the glory of God to conceal a matter, and the honor of kings to search it out. My hope lies in Jesus' promises. MJB"
Atheists don't have a religion and many humanists are not atheists. That is just an example of someone's ignorance. I think all of the replies on this atheist message board were very mild compared to what many other atheists would have told him. What he is hoping for is a lie and unfortunately he won't know that because it is obvious that he got everything he knows at The Ionia Free Fair (Ionia, Mi) religious booth.
I've seen numerous pointless posts followed by pseudo-atheist remarks (in different pseudonyms) stating that they don't have any problem with stupid theist remarks. Remarks that most any atheist would have a problem with. Most atheists would resent being told that they have no HOPE because we have a humanist philosophy.
I don't HAVE to cultivate a friendship with theists, and many atheists feel exactly the same way - we don't owe theists a damn thing. When people reply to remarks that are insulting to atheists that is not comparable to people who are making personal attacks, and complaining about atheists on an atheist message board. They need to understand, they are atheists, and maybe there is a reason you're not agreeing with them - take a guess. Linda has been debunking their creationism, religion and erroneous remarks about atheism. It's gotta be a bummer to get all those Intelligent Design web pages up and here comes someone debunking the mess.
Her reply is not comparable to a theist telling people that "nobody should read anything she writes" and what she writes is "too long and boring" - Linda has never posted a remark like that about what anyone has written. She has only remarked on what was written.
I don't have a problem reading one page, and many atheists and others have written messages just as long - or longer. Theists wouldn't like what any of them have written, but it's Linda that usually debunks their pseudo-science. I would say that theists are not usually members of atheist groups, except I know that theists do join atheist groups for the purpose of taking the group over, and the chance to proselytize.
This is not an apologist's message board yet and it's nobodies business what anyone says to a bigot who thinks he knows something about atheists when he knows nothing. He has no right to promote his ignorant religious beliefs by insulting atheists and if anyone doesn't like it - shove off kit kat.